
For example, USA Track and Field is sponsored by Nike, Visa, 24 Hour Fitness, and Hersheys. These primary sponsors pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to host events, post signage, display their logo on uniforms, and gain exclusive access to a distinct target market. Are these sponsorships the best ways to reach a target audience? Does the desired audience even notice these sponsors?

According to a recent article at NPR.org titled “Many Ask If Olympic Sponsorship Is Worth Cost” By Louisa Kim, the author argues that sponsors may not be getting the return they think. For example, the article provides a quote referring to the recent Beijing Olympic Games where a market research group found some consumer confusion as to whether Coke or Pepsi was the title sponsor. It goes as follows: "We've done research in ten cities throughout China and we've found most consumers have no idea who the actual official sponsors are," says Shaun Rein, head of the China Market Research Group. "We found 40 percent of consumers thought Coke was the sponsor, versus sixty percent for Pepsi." Unfortunately for Coke, 60 percent of the sample population didn’t even realize Coke was the title sponsor. Yet, Coke spent over $70 million to be one of twelve title sponsors for the event.
Now as a future sports marketer, I face the problem of developing new marketing programs that actually provide ROI to sponsors. Since I’m not blessed with unprecedented creativity, I will be forced to engage in typical marketing research to gain the customer insight necessary to unlock these unconscious desires of consumers. Based on the lectures, I feel like some sort of non-traditional approach will be the most effective. For instance, Dr. Rapaille’s three step technique provides million dollar insight just because he knows how to look at a problem and develop a unique solution. Thus, I think the most effective way to research sponsors needs comes from ethnographic approach where you study consumers in their natural environment. Specifically, I would use a qualitative research technique known as “Free Association.” I think this technique will allow sports marketers to discover whether sponsors’ customers are receiving the effect sponsors desires. Also, I think this technique will allow sports marketers to adapt their marketing programs to build the correct associations.
To discover what new marketing programs would be desirable, I think an experiment would provide interesting insight. For example, in class, we watched a very unscientific experiment about neuroscience where a grocery store shoppers brain waives were measured to see her responsiveness to different promotions. I think it would be interesting to do a similar type of analysis in regards to sponsorship, but this experiment could be tailored to sponsorships by also using a conjunct analysis (most sponsorship come in packages). These two methods of research seem particularly effective to gather insight into the customers’ needs. Consequently, a sports marketer can use this insight to tailor sponsorships more to what consumers want. While this may seem simple, many sports organization are so caught up in what’s always been done that many sports organization have forgotten to look for what customers truly want (i.e. Song Airlines desires to pitch the flying experiences rather than cheap rates).
Lastly, I wanted to comment on the importance of using secondary research in marketing. Often times, many publications and marketing groups have already done studies similar to the information you are trying to gather. Therefore, it’s important for a sports marketer to stay up-to-date with modern marketing research. Even if the information is not directly related, it may provide applicable information that can be used to gain insights into your customers.
